↓ Skip to main content

Flowering phenology shifts in response to biodiversity loss

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
83 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flowering phenology shifts in response to biodiversity loss
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2017
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1608357114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amelia A. Wolf, Erika S. Zavaleta, Paul C. Selmants

Abstract

Observational studies and experimental evidence agree that rising global temperatures have altered plant phenology-the timing of life events, such as flowering, germination, and leaf-out. Other large-scale global environmental changes, such as nitrogen deposition and altered precipitation regimes, have also been linked to changes in flowering times. Despite our increased understanding of how abiotic factors influence plant phenology, we know very little about how biotic interactions can affect flowering times, a significant knowledge gap given ongoing human-caused alteration of biodiversity and plant community structure at the global scale. We experimentally manipulated plant diversity in a California serpentine grassland and found that many plant species flowered earlier in response to reductions in diversity, with peak flowering date advancing an average of 0.6 days per species lost. These changes in phenology were mediated by the effects of plant diversity on soil surface temperature, available soil N, and soil moisture. Peak flowering dates were also more dispersed among species in high-diversity plots than expected based on monocultures. Our findings illustrate that shifts in plant species composition and diversity can alter the timing and distribution of flowering events, and that these changes to phenology are similar in magnitude to effects induced by climate change. Declining diversity could thus contribute to or exacerbate phenological changes attributed to rising global temperatures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 315 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 16%
Researcher 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 73 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 115 36%
Environmental Science 76 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Social Sciences 3 <1%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 82 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#349,726
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#6,313
of 103,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,335
of 323,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#120
of 962 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 962 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.