↓ Skip to main content

A review of social participation interventions for people with mental health problems

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 2,729)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
44 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
Title
A review of social participation interventions for people with mental health problems
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00127-017-1372-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Webber, Meredith Fendt-Newlin

Abstract

The association between social networks and improved mental and physical health is well documented in the literature, but mental health services rarely routinely intervene to improve an individual's social network. This review summarises social participation intervention models to illustrate different approaches which practitioners use, highlight gaps in the evidence base and suggest future directions for research. A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted, and social participation interventions were grouped into six categories using a modified narrative synthesis approach. Nineteen interventions from 14 countries were identified, six of which were evaluated using a randomised controlled trial. They were grouped together as: individual social skills training; group skills training; supported community engagement; group-based community activities; employment interventions; and peer support interventions. Social network gains appear strongest for supported community engagement interventions, but overall, evidence was limited. The small number of heterogeneous studies included in this review, which were not quality appraised, tentatively suggests that social participation interventions may increase individuals' social networks. Future research needs to use experimental designs with sufficient samples and follow-up periods longer than 12 months to enable us to make firm recommendations for mental health policy or practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 357 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Master 42 12%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 111 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 17%
Social Sciences 54 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 9%
Engineering 7 2%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 131 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#326,294
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#49
of 2,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,853
of 322,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#4
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.