↓ Skip to main content

Trends in Racial Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Trends in Racial Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11605-013-2304-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anand Shah, K.S. Clifford Chao, Truls Østbye, Anthony W. Castleberry, Ricardo Pietrobon, Beat Gloor, Bryan M. Clary, Rebekah R. White, Mathias Worni

Abstract

We tested three hypotheses: (1) blacks with pancreatic cancer are recommended surgical resection less often than whites; (2) when recommended surgical resection, blacks refuse surgery more often than whites; and lastly, (3) racial differences in refusal of surgical resection have decreased over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 45%
Chemistry 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,011,208
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1,389
of 2,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,864
of 209,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.