You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effective Area and Charge Density of Iridium Oxide Neural Electrodes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Electrochimica Acta, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.002 |
| Authors |
Alexander R. Harris, Antonio G. Paolini, Gordon G. Wallace |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 36% |
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 8 | 36% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,357,897
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Electrochimica Acta
#1,337
of 7,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,140
of 324,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electrochimica Acta
#10
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.