↓ Skip to main content

Association of Rigid-Compulsive Behavior with Functional Constipation in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Association of Rigid-Compulsive Behavior with Functional Constipation in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3084-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Marler, Bradley J. Ferguson, Evon Batey Lee, Brittany Peters, Kent C. Williams, Erin McDonnell, Eric A. Macklin, Pat Levitt, Kara Gross Margolis, David Q. Beversdorf, Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele

Abstract

Based upon checklist data from the Autism Speaks Autism Treatment Network, we hypothesized that functional constipation (FC) would be associated with rigid-compulsive behavior in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We used the Questionnaire on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms-Rome III to assess FC symptoms in 108 children with ASD. As hypothesized, FC was associated with parent ratings on the Repetitive Behavior Scales-Revised (RBS-R) Compulsive, Ritualistic, and Sameness subscales in the overall population. Of note, FC was less common in children who were not taking medications that target behavior or treat FC. In the medication-free children, rigid-compulsive behavior was not significantly associated with FC. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms underlying these associations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 16%
Student > Master 23 14%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 44 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 14%
Neuroscience 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 48 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,351,826
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,655
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,609
of 323,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#73
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.