↓ Skip to main content

A Rapid Subcortical Amygdala Route for Faces Irrespective of Spatial Frequency and Emotion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Rapid Subcortical Amygdala Route for Faces Irrespective of Spatial Frequency and Emotion
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, March 2017
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.3525-16.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica McFadyen, Martial Mermillod, Jason B. Mattingley, Veronika Halász, Marta I. Garrido

Abstract

There is significant controversy over the existence and function of a direct subcortical visual pathway to the amygdala. It is thought that this pathway rapidly transmits low spatial frequency information to the amygdala independently of the cortex and yet the directionality of this function has never been determined. We used magnetoencephalography to measure neural activity while human participants discriminated the gender of neutral and fearful faces filtered for low or high spatial frequencies. We applied dynamic causal modelling to demonstrate that the most likely underlying neural network consisted of a pulvinar-amygdala connection that was uninfluenced by spatial frequency or emotion, and a cortical-amygdala connection that conveyed high spatial frequencies. Crucially, data-driven neural simulations revealed a clear temporal advantage of the subcortical connection over the cortical connection in influencing amygdala activity. Thus, our findings support the existence of a rapid subcortical pathway that is non-selective in terms of the spatial frequency or emotional content of faces. We propose that that the 'coarseness' of the subcortical route may be better reframed as 'generalised'.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe human amygdala co-ordinates how we respond to biologically relevant stimuli, such as threat or reward. It has been postulated that the amygdala first receives visual input via a rapid subcortical route that conveys 'coarse' information, namely low spatial frequencies. For the first time, the present paper provides direction-specific evidence from computational modelling that the subcortical route plays a generalised role in visual processing by rapidly transmitting raw, unfiltered information directly to the amygdala. This calls into question a widely held assumption across human and animal research that fear responses are produced faster by low spatial frequencies. Our proposed mechanism suggests organisms quickly generate fear responses to a wide range of visual properties, heavily implicating future research on anxiety-prevention strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 164 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 32%
Neuroscience 50 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,773,859
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#2,726
of 24,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,853
of 321,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#53
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.