↓ Skip to main content

Expression patterns of programmed death-ligand 1 in esophageal adenocarcinomas: comparison between primary tumors and metastases

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Expression patterns of programmed death-ligand 1 in esophageal adenocarcinomas: comparison between primary tumors and metastases
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00262-017-1982-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bastian Dislich, Alexandra Stein, Christian A. Seiler, Dino Kröll, Sabina Berezowska, Inti Zlobec, José Galvan, Julia Slotta-Huspenina, Axel Walch, Rupert Langer

Abstract

Expression analysis of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) may be helpful in guiding clinical decisions for immune checkpoint inhibition therapy, but testing by immunohistochemistry may be hampered by heterogeneous staining patterns within tumors and expression changes during metastatic course. PD-L1 expression (clone SP142) was investigated in esophageal adenocarcinomas using tissue microarrays (TMA) from 112 primary resected tumors, preoperative biopsies and full slide sections from a subset of these cases (n = 24), corresponding lymph node (n = 55) and distant metastases (n = 17). PD-L1 expression was scored as 0.1-1, >1, >5, >50% positive membranous staining of tumor cells and any positive staining of tumor-associated inflammatory infiltrates and/or stroma cells. There was a significant correlation with overall PD-L1 expression between the full slide sections and the TMA (p = 0.001), but not with the corresponding biopsies. PD-L1 expression in tumor cells >1% was detected in 8.0% of cases (9/112) and 51.8% of cases (58/112) in tumor-associated inflammatory infiltrates and/or stroma cells of primary tumors. Epithelial expression in metastases was found in 5.6% of cases (4/72) and immune cell expression in 18.1% of cases (13/72), but did not correlate with the expression pattern in the primary tumor. Overall PD-L1 expression in the primary tumor did not influence survival. However, PD-L1 expression was correlated with the number of CD3(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor center, and a combinational score of PD-L1 status/CD3(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was correlated with patients' overall survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Other 7 28%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 52%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,450,375
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#2,166
of 2,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,191
of 308,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#38
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.