You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of Multi-Source and Multi-Temporal Remotely Sensed and Ancillary Data on the Accuracy of Random Forest Classification of Wetlands in Northern Minnesota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Remote Sensing, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3390/rs5073212 |
| Authors |
Jennifer M. Corcoran, Joseph F. Knight, Alisa L. Gallant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 243 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 17% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 52 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 59 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 56 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 12% |
| Engineering | 23 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 65 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,422,295
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing
#5,490
of 13,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,139
of 208,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing
#18
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.