| Title |
Effects of caffeine with repeated dosing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, March 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00315208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. P. Denaro, C. R. Brown, P. Jacob, N. L. Benowitz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,222,353
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#259
of 2,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#943
of 17,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them