↓ Skip to main content

Estimated verbal IQ and the odds of problem gambling: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimated verbal IQ and the odds of problem gambling: a population-based study
Published in
Psychological Medicine, September 2013
DOI 10.1017/s0033291713002195
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Rai, W. Hall, P. Bebbington, P. Skapinakis, A. Hassiotis, S. Weich, H. Meltzer, P. Moran, T. Brugha, A. Strydom, M. Farrell

Abstract

The neurocognitive deficits and other correlates of problem gambling are also observable in individuals with lower cognitive abilities, suggesting that a low IQ may be a determinant of problem gambling. There has been very little research into this possibility. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics associated with problem gambling in a large population-based study in England, with a particular focus on IQ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Philosophy 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,449,299
of 24,261,860 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#1,598
of 5,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,791
of 201,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#20
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,261,860 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.