↓ Skip to main content

A Review of the Genetics of Hypertension with a Focus on Gene-Environment Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
A Review of the Genetics of Hypertension with a Focus on Gene-Environment Interactions
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11906-017-0718-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

RJ Waken, Lisa de las Fuentes, D.C. Rao

Abstract

Here, we discuss the interpretation and modeling of gene-environment interactions in hypertension-related phenotypes, with a focus on the necessary assumptions and possible challenges. Recently, small cohort studies have discovered several novel genetic variants associated with hypertension-related phenotypes through modeling gene-environment interactions. Several consortia-based meta-analytic efforts have uncovered many novel genetic variants in hypertension without modeling interaction terms, giving promise to future meta-analytic efforts that incorporate gene-environment interactions. Heritability studies and genome-wide association studies have established that hypertension, a prevalent cardiovascular disease, has a genetic component that may be modulated by the environment (such as lifestyle factors). This review includes a discussion of known genetic associations for hypertension/blood pressure, including those resulting from the incorporation of gene-environmental interaction modeling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,844,449
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#191
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,313
of 308,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.