↓ Skip to main content

Contributions of the anterolateral complex and the anterolateral ligament to rotatory knee stability in the setting of ACL Injury: a roundtable discussion

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Contributions of the anterolateral complex and the anterolateral ligament to rotatory knee stability in the setting of ACL Injury: a roundtable discussion
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00167-017-4436-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Volker Musahl, Alan Getgood, Philippe Neyret, Steven Claes, Jeremy M. Burnham, Cecile Batailler, Bertrand Sonnery‐Cottet, Andy Williams, Andrew Amis, Stefano Zaffagnini, Jón Karlsson

Abstract

Persistent rotatory knee laxity is increasingly recognized as a common finding after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While the reasons behind rotator knee laxity are multifactorial, the impact of the anterolateral knee structures is significant. As such, substantial focus has been directed toward better understanding these structures, including their anatomy, biomechanics, in vivo function, injury patterns, and the ideal procedures with which to address any rotatory knee laxity that results from damage to these structures. However, the complexity of lateral knee anatomy, varying dissection techniques, differing specimen preparation methods, inconsistent sectioning techniques in biomechanical studies, and confusing terminology have led to discrepancies in published studies on the topic. Furthermore, anatomical and functional descriptions have varied widely. As such, we have assembled a panel of expert surgeons and scientists to discuss the roles of the anterolateral structures in rotatory knee laxity, the healing potential of these structures, the most appropriate procedures to address rotatory knee laxity, and the indications for these procedures. In this round table discussion, KSSTA Editor-in-Chief Professor Jón Karlsson poses a variety of relevant and timely questions, and experts from around the world provide answers based on their personal experiences, scientific study, and interpretations of the literature. Level of evidence I.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 32 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Engineering 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 42 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,192,260
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,369
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,325
of 308,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#28
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.