Title |
Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients: development and pilot study of an intervention in primary care (the OPTI-SCRIPT study)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-307 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Barbara Clyne, Marie C Bradley, Carmel M Hughes, Daniel Clear, Ronan McDonnell, David Williams, Tom Fahey, Susan M Smith |
Abstract |
Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older people is common in primary care and can result in increased morbidity, adverse drug events, hospitalizations and mortality. The prevalence of PIP in Ireland is estimated at 36% with an associated expenditure of over €45 million in 2007. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework to the development of an intervention to decrease PIP in Irish primary care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Ireland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 150 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
Researcher | 26 | 17% |
Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 17% |
Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 27% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 25 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#13,390,169
of 22,719,618 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,604
of 7,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,235
of 196,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#60
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,719,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.