| Chapter title |
Assessing quality of life in eating disorder patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, February 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-004-2657-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. M. Mond, C. Owen, P. J. Hay, B. Rodgers, P. J. V. Beumont |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,785,156
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#321
of 3,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,233
of 155,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.