↓ Skip to main content

Discontinuities, cross‐scale patterns, and the organization of ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discontinuities, cross‐scale patterns, and the organization of ecosystems
Published in
Ecology, March 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-1315.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsty L. Nash, Craig R. Allen, David G. Angeler, Chris Barichievy, Tarsha Eason, Ahjond S. Garmestani, Nicholas A. J. Graham, Dean Granholm, Melinda Knutson, R. John Nelson, Magnus Nyström, Craig A. Stow, Shana M. Sundstrom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
South Africa 3 1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 269 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 28%
Researcher 66 23%
Student > Master 36 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Student > Postgraduate 13 4%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 33 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 38%
Environmental Science 99 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 46 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,522,286
of 24,701,898 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#2,772
of 6,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,263
of 227,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#26
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,701,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.