↓ Skip to main content

Differences in depression, treatment satisfaction and injection behaviour in adults with type 1 diabetes and different degrees of lipohypertrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in depression, treatment satisfaction and injection behaviour in adults with type 1 diabetes and different degrees of lipohypertrophy
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, May 2017
DOI 10.1111/jocn.13801
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingvild Hernar, Johannes Haltbakk, Anders Broström

Abstract

To assess the prevalence of lipohypertrophy, and to compare differences in external, personal, and regimen factors in adults with type 1 diabetes and different degrees of lipohypertrophy. Suboptimal insulin injection behavior is associated with lipohypertrophy, which may affect insulin absorption and lead to blood glucose fluctuations. Few, if any studies have investigated how external, personal, and regimen factors differ in people with type 1 diabetes and different degrees of lipohypertrophy. A cross-sectional study including adults with type 1 diabetes at a diabetes outpatient clinic in a Norwegian university hospital. Participants (n=215) were included consecutively at scheduled appointments. Sociodemographic-, diabetes- and insulin treatment data, and self-report questionnaires concerning patient activation (PAM), depression (PHQ-2), diabetes distress (DDS), type D personality (DS14), treatment satisfaction (ITSQ), and motivation (TSRQ), were collected. Lipohypertrophic injection sites were identified by palpation by diabetes specialist nurses. Lipohypertrophy was present in 53% and was more frequent in insulin pen users (63%) compared to insulin pump users (34%). Participants with two or more lipohypertrophic areas had higher depression scores, lower treatment satisfaction with glycemic control, higher bolus doses, and reported suboptimal injection behavior compared to those with no lipohypertrophic areas. There were no differences in patient activation, diabetes distress, type D personality, or motivation between the groups. Compared to pump treatment, pen treatment requires greater awareness of injection technique. Depressive symptoms and lower treatment satisfaction might affect diabetes self-management and glycemic control, but the association with lipohypertrophy needs further exploration. Lipohypertrophy is more frequent in insulin pen users compared to pump users. Nurses should focus on injection technique education, and should also screen for depressive symptoms and treatment satisfaction as those factors could be associated with development of lipohypertrophy. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 37 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Psychology 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 40 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,176,837
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#837
of 5,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,759
of 320,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#34
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.