↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis From 2 Randomized, Controlled Trials: SUMMACTA and BREVACTA

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis From 2 Randomized, Controlled Trials: SUMMACTA and BREVACTA
Published in
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/jcph.826
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hisham Abdallah, Joy C. Hsu, Peng Lu, Scott Fettner, Xiaoping Zhang, Wendy Douglass, Min Bao, Lucy Rowell, Gerd R. Burmester, Alan Kivitz

Abstract

Tocilizumab is a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed on the 24-week, double-blind parts of 2 randomized controlled trials: SUMMACTA and BREVACTA. SUMMACTA compared subcutaneous tocilizumab 162 mg every week (QW) to intravenous tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W), while BREVACTA evaluated 162 mg subcutaneous tocilizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) versus placebo. In addition to noncompartmental analysis, a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model, with first-order absorption (for SC) and linear and Michaelis-Menten elimination was used. Mean observed steady-state predose tocilizumab concentrations at week 24 were 40 μg/mL and 7.4 μg/mL for subcutaneous QW and Q2W dosing, respectively, and 18 μg/mL for IV. In the population PK model, body weight was an important covariate affecting clearance and volume of distribution. Mean (SD) population predicted predose concentration for patients ≥100 kg was 23.0 (13.5) μg/mL for subcutaneous tocilizumab QW and 1.0 (1.6) μg/mL for Q2W. Efficacy was lowest with SC Q2W dosing in patients >100 kg, reflecting lower exposure. The SC Q2W regimen is not recommended for these patients. Pharmacodynamic responses were comparable for the QW SC and Q4W IV regimens, and less pronounced with the Q2W SC regimen. No trend was observed for increased adverse events with increasing tocilizumab exposure. The results of this analysis are consistent with the non-inferiority of efficacy of the QW SC regimen to Q4W IV and the superiority of the Q2W SC to placebo. These results support the label recommendations for subcutaneous dosing of tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 37 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,441,847
of 24,565,648 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#245
of 2,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,101
of 427,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#9
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,565,648 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.