| Title |
ACL injury prevention, more effective with a different way of motor learning?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-010-1313-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Benjaminse, Egbert Otten |
| Abstract |
What happens to the transference of learning proper jump-landing technique in isolation when an individual is expected to perform at a competitive level yet tries to maintain proper jump-landing technique? This is the key question for researchers, physical therapists, athletic trainers and coaches involved in ACL injury prevention in athletes. The need for ACL injury prevention is clear, however, in spite of these ongoing initiatives and reported early successes, ACL injury rates and the associated gender disparity have not diminished. One problem could be the difficulties with the measurements of injury rates and the difficulties with the implementation of thorough large scale injury prevention programs. A second issue could be the transition from conscious awareness during training sessions on technique in the laboratory to unexpected and automatic movements during a training or game involves complicated motor control adaptations. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the issue of motor learning in relation to ACL injury prevention and to post suggestions for future research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 5 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 69% |
| Scientists | 22 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Lebanon | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 17% |
| Unknown | 88 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 100 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 11% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 98 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#892,464
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#55
of 2,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,710
of 110,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.