↓ Skip to main content

Current and future prospects for nanotechnology in animal production

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Current and future prospects for nanotechnology in animal production
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40104-017-0157-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily K. Hill, Julang Li

Abstract

Nanoparticles have been used as diagnostic and therapeutic agents in the human medical field for quite some time, though their application in veterinary medicine and animal production is still relatively new. Recently, production demands on the livestock industry have been centered around the use of antibiotics as growth promoters due to growing concern over microbial antibiotic resistance. With many countries reporting increased incidences of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, laws and regulations are being updated to end in-feed antibiotic use in the animal production industry. This sets the need for suitable alternatives to be established for inclusion in feed. Many reports have shown evidence that nanoparticles may be good candidates for animal growth promotion and antimicrobials. The current status and advancements of nanotechnological applications in animal production will be the focus of this review and the emerging roles of nanoparticles for nutrient delivery, biocidal agents, and tools in veterinary medicine and reproduction will be discussed. Additionally, influences on meat, egg, and milk quality will be reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 214 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 63 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 9%
Chemistry 7 3%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 79 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,498,682
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#106
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,476
of 322,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.