↓ Skip to main content

People’s Perceptions about the Importance of Forests on Borneo

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
29 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
People’s Perceptions about the Importance of Forests on Borneo
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0073008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Meijaard, Nicola K. Abram, Jessie A. Wells, Anne-Sophie Pellier, Marc Ancrenaz, David L. A. Gaveau, Rebecca K. Runting, Kerrie Mengersen

Abstract

We ascertained villagers' perceptions about the importance of forests for their livelihoods and health through 1,837 reliably answered interviews of mostly male respondents from 185 villages in Indonesian and Malaysian Borneo. Variation in these perceptions related to several environmental and social variables, as shown in classification and regression analyses. Overall patterns indicated that forest use and cultural values are highest among people on Borneo who live close to remaining forest, and especially among older Christian residents. Support for forest clearing depended strongly on the scale at which deforestation occurs. Deforestation for small-scale agriculture was generally considered to be positive because it directly benefits people's welfare. Large-scale deforestation (e.g., for industrial oil palm or acacia plantations), on the other hand, appeared to be more context-dependent, with most respondents considering it to have overall negative impacts on them, but with people in some areas considering the benefits to outweigh the costs. The interviews indicated high awareness of negative environmental impacts of deforestation, with high levels of concern over higher temperatures, air pollution and loss of clean water sources. Our study is unique in its geographic and trans-national scale. Our findings enable the development of maps of forest use and perceptions that could inform land use planning at a range of scales. Incorporating perspectives such as these could significantly reduce conflict over forest resources and ultimately result in more equitable development processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 376 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 18%
Student > Master 67 17%
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 66 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 110 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 24%
Social Sciences 42 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 3%
Arts and Humanities 9 2%
Other 38 10%
Unknown 82 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#780,683
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,330
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,420
of 214,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#272
of 5,080 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,080 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.