↓ Skip to main content

A cross-sectional study of frequency and factors associated with dog walking in 9–10 year old children in Liverpool, UK

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
A cross-sectional study of frequency and factors associated with dog walking in 9–10 year old children in Liverpool, UK
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-822
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carri Westgarth, Lynne M Boddy, Gareth Stratton, Alexander J German, Rosalind M Gaskell, Karen P Coyne, Peter Bundred, Sandra McCune, Susan Dawson

Abstract

Owning a pet dog could potentially improve child health through encouraging participation in physical activity, through dog walking. However, evidence to support this is limited and conflicting. In particular, little is known about children's participation in dog walking and factors that may be associated with this. The objective of this study was to describe the participation of children in dog walking, including their own and those belonging to somebody else, and investigate factors associated with regular walking with their own pet dog.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 21 23%
Psychology 10 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#2,539,825
of 24,583,586 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,968
of 16,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,875
of 203,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#60
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,583,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.