↓ Skip to main content

EFSA’s scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
EFSA’s scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead
Published in
Transgenic Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11248-013-9741-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yann Devos, Jaime Aguilera, Zoltán Diveki, Ana Gomes, Yi Liu, Claudia Paoletti, Patrick du Jardin, Lieve Herman, Joe N. Perry, Elisabeth Waigmann

Abstract

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and derived food and feed products are subject to a risk analysis and regulatory approval before they can enter the market in the European Union (EU). In this risk analysis process, the role of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), which was created in 2002 in response to multiple food crises, is to independently assess and provide scientific advice to risk managers on any possible risks that the use of GMOs may pose to human and animal health and the environment. EFSA's scientific advice is elaborated by its GMO Panel with the scientific support of several working groups and EFSA's GMO Unit. This review presents EFSA's scientific activities and highlights its achievements on the risk assessment of GMOs for the first 10 years of its existence. Since 2002, EFSA has issued 69 scientific opinions on genetically modified (GM) plant market registration applications, of which 62 for import and processing for food and feed uses, six for cultivation and one for the use of pollen (as or in food), and 19 scientific opinions on applications for marketing products made with GM microorganisms. Several guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants, GM microorganisms and GM animals, as well as on specific issues such as post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) were elaborated. EFSA also provided scientific advice upon request of the European Commission on safeguard clause and emergency measures invoked by EU Member States, annual PMEM reports, the potential risks of new biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques, evaluations of previously assessed GMOs in the light of new scientific publications, and the use of antibiotic resistance marker genes in GM plants. Future challenges relevant to the risk assessment of GMOs are discussed. EFSA's risk assessments of GMO applications ensure that data are analysed and presented in a way that facilitates scientifically sound decisions that protect human and animal health and the environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 164 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Other 13 8%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Environmental Science 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 32 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,081,914
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#318
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,819
of 200,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.