| Title |
Engaging rational discrimination: exploring reasons for placing regulatory constraints on decision support systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ethics and Information Technology, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10676-009-9198-6 |
| Authors |
Oscar H. Gandy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 61% |
| Scientists | 12 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 26% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 28 | 30% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#514,113
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from Ethics and Information Technology
#16
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,223
of 124,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethics and Information Technology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them