Title |
The Spectrum of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-Associated Chronic Eosinophilic Leukemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Medicine (Wolters Kluwer), September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1097/md.0b013e3182a71eba |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fanny Legrand, Aline Renneville, Elizabeth MacIntyre, Samuel Mastrilli, Felix Ackermann, Jean Michel Cayuela, Philippe Rousselot, Aline Schmidt-Tanguy, Olivier Fain, Marc Michel, Jean-Pierre de Jaureguiberry, Pierre-Yves Hatron, Pascale Cony-Makhoul, Didier Lefranc, Damien Sène, Vincent Cottin, Mohamed Hamidou, Olivier Lidove, André Baruchel, Sylvain Dubucquoi, Olivier Bletry, Claude Preudhomme, Monique Capron, Lionel Prin, Jean Emmanuel Kahn |
Abstract |
Imatinib is the treatment of choice for FIP1L1/PDGFRA (F/P)-associated chronic eosinophilic leukemia (F/P CEL), but its optimal dosing, duration, and possibility of discontinuation are still a matter of debate. A retrospective multicenter study was conducted with 44 F/P CEL patients identified in the French Eosinophil Network and treated with imatinib. The most frequently involved systems were skin (57%), spleen (52%), and lung (45%), and eosinophilic heart disease was observed in 15 patients (34%). Complete hematologic response (CHR) was obtained in all patients, and complete molecular response (CMR) in 95% of patients (average initial imatinib dose, 165 mg/d). For 29 patients the imatinib dose was tapered with a maintenance dose of 58 mg/d (±34 mg/d), allowing sustained CHR and CMR. None of the patients developed resistance during a median follow-up of 52.3 months (range, 1.4-97.4 mo). Imatinib was stopped in 11 patients; 6 of the patients subsequently relapsed, but 5 remained in persistent CHR or CMR (range, 9-88 mo). These results confirm that an initial low-dose regimen of imatinib (100 mg/d) followed by a lower maintenance dose can be efficient for obtaining long-term CHR and CMR. Our data also suggest that imatinib can be stopped in some patients without molecular relapse. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 23% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 52% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 19% |