↓ Skip to main content

Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2257 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3013 Mendeley
Title
Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals
Published in
Nature, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature21707
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry P. Hughes, James T. Kerry, Mariana Álvarez-Noriega, Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero, Kristen D. Anderson, Andrew H. Baird, Russell C. Babcock, Maria Beger, David R. Bellwood, Ray Berkelmans, Tom C. Bridge, Ian R. Butler, Maria Byrne, Neal E. Cantin, Steeve Comeau, Sean R. Connolly, Graeme S. Cumming, Steven J. Dalton, Guillermo Diaz-Pulido, C. Mark Eakin, Will F. Figueira, James P. Gilmour, Hugo B. Harrison, Scott F. Heron, Andrew S. Hoey, Jean-Paul A. Hobbs, Mia O. Hoogenboom, Emma V. Kennedy, Chao-yang Kuo, Janice M. Lough, Ryan J. Lowe, Gang Liu, Malcolm T. McCulloch, Hamish A. Malcolm, Michael J. McWilliam, John M. Pandolfi, Rachel J. Pears, Morgan S. Pratchett, Verena Schoepf, Tristan Simpson, William J. Skirving, Brigitte Sommer, Gergely Torda, David R. Wachenfeld, Bette L. Willis, Shaun K. Wilson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,897 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,013 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 2990 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 581 19%
Student > Master 509 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 434 14%
Researcher 350 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 85 3%
Other 321 11%
Unknown 733 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 732 24%
Environmental Science 658 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 238 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 188 6%
Engineering 63 2%
Other 301 10%
Unknown 833 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3675. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,474
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#143
of 98,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 323,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#3
of 887 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 887 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.