↓ Skip to main content

Social Support and Its Impact on Ethnic Identity and HIV Risk among Migrant Workers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Social Support and Its Impact on Ethnic Identity and HIV Risk among Migrant Workers
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40615-017-0347-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy Shehadeh, Muni Rubens, Jennifer Attonito, Terri Jennings

Abstract

Migrant workers are disproportionately affected by HIV due to poverty, social isolation, lack of access to and availability of health care services, acculturation, language barriers, constant mobility, and lack of knowledge. This study examined the impact of changes in social support on ethnic identity and HIV risk behaviors among migrant workers in South Florida. For this study, baseline and 6-month follow-up data were collected from an HIV intervention study among migrant workers in South Florida (n = 270) who reported unprotected sex in the past 30 days. The Multigroup Identity Measure was used to assess ethnic identity and the Social Provisions Scale examined the degree to which respondents' social relationships provide various dimensions of social support. Social support was a significant predictor of ethnic identity and of ethnic identity subscales, ethnic identity belonging and ethnic identity explore. There were small but statistically significant short-term changes in ethnic identity and ethnic identity subscales among the migrant workers over the 6-month time period assessed after controlling for the intervention. Future studies should be conducted over a longer period of time to better assess this relationship and possible factors to reduce HIV risk behaviors. There is a need to focus on improving the quality of health and reduce HIV and other risks experienced by this marginalized community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Researcher 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Psychology 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,852,691
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#729
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,099
of 307,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.