↓ Skip to main content

Modelling Jets, Tori and Flares in Pulsar Wind Nebulae

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Modelling Jets, Tori and Flares in Pulsar Wind Nebulae
Published in
Space Science Reviews, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11214-017-0344-x
Authors

Oliver Porth, Rolf Buehler, Barbara Olmi, Serguei Komissarov, Astrid Lamberts, Elena Amato, Yajie Yuan, Alexander Rudy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 15 88%
Unspecified 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2017.
All research outputs
#21,168,135
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#1,072
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,792
of 310,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#23
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.