↓ Skip to main content

Mercury in Feathers and Blood of Gulls from the Southern Baltic Coast, Poland

Overview of attention for article published in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Mercury in Feathers and Blood of Gulls from the Southern Baltic Coast, Poland
Published in
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11270-017-3308-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilia Szumiło-Pilarska, Lucyna Falkowska, Agnieszka Grajewska, Włodzimierz Meissner

Abstract

Gulls were assessed as sentinels of contamination in the coastal zone of the Southern Baltic, research material being obtained from dead birds collected on Polish beaches and near fishing ports in 2009-2012. In feathers and blood of four gull species: herring gull (Larus argentatus), common gull (Larus canus), black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus), and great black-backed gull (Larus marinus), concentration of total mercury (HgT) was assayed, taking into account the type of feathers, sex, and age. Stable isotopes (δ(15)N, δ(13)C) were used as tracers of trophic position in the food web. In the study, feathers and blood were compared as non-invasive indicators of alimentary exposure introducing mercury into the system. In order to do that, the correlations between mercury concentrations in the blood, feathers, and the birds' internal tissues were examined. The strongest relations were observed in the liver for each species R(2)Common Gull = 0.94, p = 0.001; R(2)Black-headed Gull = 0.89, p = 0.001; R(2)Great Black-backed Gull = 0.53, p = 0.001; R(2)Herring Gull = 0.78, p = 0.001. While no correlation was found with feathers, only developing feathers of juvenile herring gulls were found to be a good indicator immediate of exposure through food (R(2)muscle = 0.71, p = 0.001; R(2)kidneys = 0.73, p = 0.001; R(2)heart = 0.89, p = 0.001; R(2)lungs = 0.86, p = 0.001; R(2)brain = 0.83, p = 0.001). Additionally, based on studies of herring gull primary feathers, decrease of mercury concentration in the diet of birds over the last two decades is also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 21%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 33%
Environmental Science 11 26%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,982,858
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#297
of 1,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,128
of 311,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.