| Title |
Introduction and invasion of the red-eared slider and its parasites in freshwater ecosystems of Southern Europe: risk assessment for the European pond turtle in wild environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1331-y |
| Authors |
Laurent Héritier, Aitor Valdeón, Amel Sadaoui, Thomas Gendre, Sébastien Ficheux, Salah Bouamer, Nadia Kechemir-Issad, Louis Du Preez, Carmen Palacios, Olivier Verneau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,541,646
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#671
of 2,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,610
of 322,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.