Title |
Ultrasound assessment of acute appendicitis in paediatric patients: methodology and pictorial overview of findings seen
|
---|---|
Published in |
Insights into Imaging, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13244-013-0275-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan J. Quigley, Samuel Stafrace |
Abstract |
Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency in the paediatric population. Computed tomography (CT) has been shown to have high accuracy and low operator dependence in the diagnosis of appendicitis. However, with increased concerns regarding CT usage in children, ultrasound (US) is the imaging modality of choice in patients where appendicitis is suspected. This review describes and illustrates the step-wise graded-compression technique for the visualisation of the appendix, the normal and pathological appearances of the appendix, as well as the imaging characteristics of the common differentials. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Peru | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 12% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 24% |
Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 60% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2013.
All research outputs
#21,699,788
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#946
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,833
of 204,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.