↓ Skip to main content

Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality : 21st International Working Conference, REFSQ 2015, Essen, Germany, March 23-26, 2015. Proceedings

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality : 21st International Working Conference, REFSQ 2015, Essen, Germany, March 23-26, 2015. Proceedings'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Experimental Validation of a Risk Assessment Method
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Supporting the Validation of Adequacy in Requirements-Based Hazard Mitigations
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Metrics for the Evaluation of Feature Models in an Industrial Context: A Case Study at Opel
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Modeling and Reasoning About Information Quality Requirements
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Detecting and Correcting Outdated Requirements in Function-Centered Engineering of Embedded Systems
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Estimating the Implementation Risk of Requirements in Agile Software Development Projects with Traceability Metrics
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 The Role of Catalogues of Threats and Security Controls in Security Risk Assessment: An Empirical Study with ATM Professionals
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analyzing and Enforcing Security Mechanisms on Requirements Specifications
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 How Artifacts Support and Impede Requirements Communication
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Consonance Between Economic and IT Services: Finding the Balance Between Conflicting Requirements
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 From Stakeholder Requirements to Formal Specifications Through Refinement
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Towards More Efficient Requirements Formalization: A Study
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 The Emerging Requirement for Digital Addiction Labels
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Challenges of the Customer Organization’s Requirements Engineering Process in the Outsourced Environment – A Case Study
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Case Study Evaluation of the Guideline-Supported QUPER Model for Elicitation of Quality Requirements
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Towards Crowd-Based Requirements Engineering A Research Preview
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Functional Requirements Modelling for Interactive TV Applications
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 FlexiView: A Magnet-Based Approach for Visualizing Requirements Artifacts
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Requirements Engineering in the Bidding Stage of Software Projects – A Research Preview
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Research Preview: Supporting Requirements Feedback Flows in Iterative System Development
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 User-Constrained Clustering in Online Requirements Forums
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 A Systematic Literature Review of Requirements Prioritization Criteria
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Embedding Stakeholder Values in the Requirements Engineering Process
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality : 21st International Working Conference, REFSQ 2015, Essen, Germany, March 23-26, 2015. Proceedings
Published by
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-16101-3
ISBNs
978-3-31-916101-3, 978-3-31-916100-6
Editors

Fricker, Samuel A., Schneider, Kurt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Lecturer 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 37%
Engineering 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 23 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,642,360
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,516
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,555
of 354,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#70
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.