| Title |
Species decline—but why? Explanations of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) declines in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-002-1174-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Johan Kotze, Robert B. O'Hara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Hungary | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 320 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 23% |
| Researcher | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 204 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 58 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 3% |
| Unknown | 66 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,517,025
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#887
of 5,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,789
of 144,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.