| Title |
A Hospital-Based Doula Program and Childbirth Outcomes in an Urban, Multicultural Setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maternal and Child Health Journal, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10995-007-0245-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Mottl-Santiago, Catherine Walker, Jean Ewan, Olivera Vragovic, Suzanne Winder, Phillip Stubblefield |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study is to determine whether there are differences in birth and breastfeeding outcomes for women who received labor support through a hospital-based doula program, compared with those who did not receive doula support in labor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,081,083
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#305
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,211
of 70,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.