↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
3 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Individualized patient tumor organoids faithfully preserve human brain tumor ecosystems and predict patient response to therapy
Published in
Cell Stem Cell, February 2025
DOI 10.1016/j.stem.2025.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianping Peng, Xiujian Ma, Wei Hua, Changwen Wang, Youjun Chu, Meng Sun, Valentina Fermi, Stefan Hamelmann, Katharina Lindner, Chunxuan Shao, Julia Zaman, Weili Tian, Yue Zhuo, Yassin Harim, Nadja Stöffler, Linda Hammann, Qungen Xiao, Xiaoliang Jin, Rolf Warta, Catharina Lotsch, Xuran Zhuang, Yuan Feng, Minjie Fu, Xin Zhang, Jinsen Zhang, Hao Xu, Fufang Qiu, Liqian Xie, Yi Zhang, Wei Zhu, Zunguo Du, Lorena Salgueiro, Mark Schneider, Florian Eichhorn, Arthur Lefevre, Stefan Pusch, Valery Grinevich, Miriam Ratliff, Sonja Loges, Lukas Bunse, Felix Sahm, Yangfei Xiang, Andreas Unterberg, Andreas von Deimling, Michael Platten, Christel Herold-Mende, Yonghe Wu, Hai-Kun Liu, Ying Mao

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Unspecified 3 4%
Student > Master 3 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 42 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 44 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2025.
All research outputs
#759,006
of 32,440,831 outputs
Outputs from Cell Stem Cell
#480
of 3,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,894
of 397,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Stem Cell
#9
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,440,831 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.