↓ Skip to main content

Sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) degradation by nitrate-reducing bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) degradation by nitrate-reducing bacteria
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00253-017-8212-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana M. S. Paulo, Rozelin Aydin, Mauricio R. Dimitrov, Harm Vreeling, Ana J. Cavaleiro, Pedro A. García-Encina, Alfons J. M. Stams, Caroline M. Plugge

Abstract

The surfactant sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) is widely used in the composition of detergents and frequently ends up in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). While aerobic SLES degradation is well studied, little is known about the fate of this compound in anoxic environments, such as denitrification tanks of WWTPs, nor about the bacteria involved in the anoxic biodegradation. Here, we used SLES as sole carbon and energy source, at concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 mg L(-1), to enrich and isolate nitrate-reducing bacteria from activated sludge of a WWTP with the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A(2)/O) concept. In the 50 mg L(-1) enrichment, Comamonas (50%), Pseudomonas (24%), and Alicycliphilus (12%) were present at higher relative abundance, while Pseudomonas (53%) became dominant in the 1000 mg L(-1) enrichment. Aeromonas hydrophila strain S7, Pseudomonas stutzeri strain S8, and Pseudomonas nitroreducens strain S11 were isolated from the enriched cultures. Under denitrifying conditions, strains S8 and S11 degraded 500 mg L(-1) SLES in less than 1 day, while strain S7 required more than 6 days. Strains S8 and S11 also showed a remarkable resistance to SLES, being able to grow and reduce nitrate with SLES concentrations up to 40 g L(-1). Strain S11 turned out to be the best anoxic SLES degrader, degrading up to 41% of 500 mg L(-1). The comparison between SLES anoxic and oxic degradation by strain S11 revealed differences in SLES cleavage, degradation, and sulfate accumulation; both ester and ether cleavage were probably employed in SLES anoxic degradation by strain S11.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 30 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 16%
Engineering 8 10%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Chemical Engineering 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 34 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,806,311
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,185
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,795
of 311,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#41
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.