↓ Skip to main content

Neural cytoskeleton capabilities for learning and memory

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Physics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 297)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Neural cytoskeleton capabilities for learning and memory
Published in
Journal of Biological Physics, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10867-009-9153-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Avner Priel, Jack A. Tuszynski, Nancy J. Woolf

Abstract

This paper proposes a physical model involving the key structures within the neural cytoskeleton as major players in molecular-level processing of information required for learning and memory storage. In particular, actin filaments and microtubules are macromolecules having highly charged surfaces that enable them to conduct electric signals. The biophysical properties of these filaments relevant to the conduction of ionic current include a condensation of counterions on the filament surface and a nonlinear complex physical structure conducive to the generation of modulated waves. Cytoskeletal filaments are often directly connected with both ionotropic and metabotropic types of membrane-embedded receptors, thereby linking synaptic inputs to intracellular functions. Possible roles for cable-like, conductive filaments in neurons include intracellular information processing, regulating developmental plasticity, and mediating transport. The cytoskeletal proteins form a complex network capable of emergent information processing, and they stand to intervene between inputs to and outputs from neurons. In this manner, the cytoskeletal matrix is proposed to work with neuronal membrane and its intrinsic components (e.g., ion channels, scaffolding proteins, and adaptor proteins), especially at sites of synaptic contacts and spines. An information processing model based on cytoskeletal networks is proposed that may underlie certain types of learning and memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Japan 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 69 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Neuroscience 9 12%
Engineering 9 12%
Physics and Astronomy 6 8%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,395,364
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Physics
#45
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,904
of 92,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Physics
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.