↓ Skip to main content

Organized simultaneous displays facilitate learning of complex natural science categories

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Organized simultaneous displays facilitate learning of complex natural science categories
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, February 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1251-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian J. Meagher, Paulo F. Carvalho, Robert L. Goldstone, Robert M. Nosofsky

Abstract

Subjects learned to classify images of rocks into the categories igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary. In accord with the real-world structure of these categories, the to-be-classified rocks in the experiments had a dispersed similarity structure. Our central hypothesis was that learning of these complex categories would be improved through observational study of organized, simultaneous displays of the multiple rock tokens. In support of this hypothesis, a technique that included the presentation of the simultaneous displays during phases of the learning process yielded improved acquisition (Experiment 1) and generalization (Experiment 2) compared to methods that relied solely on sequential forms of study and testing. The technique appears to provide a good starting point for application of cognitive-psychology principles of effective category learning to the science classroom.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 40%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Philosophy 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 20%