↓ Skip to main content

The effect of intravenous iron on postoperative transfusion requirements in hip fracture patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
The effect of intravenous iron on postoperative transfusion requirements in hip fracture patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Rowlands, Daren P Forward, Opinder Sahota, Iain K Moppett

Abstract

Anaemia following hip fracture is common. Approximately 30 to 45% of patients have haemoglobin concentrations below population norms on admission, and around 10% are severely anaemic. Anaemia on admission, and in the postoperative period, is associated with poor outcomes with regard to mobility, postoperative mortality and readmission. There is currently no clear consensus on the optimal method of managing perioperative anaemia in this group of frail patients with frequent comorbidity. Liberal red cell transfusion in the postoperative period does not appear to improve outcome, whereas tranexamic acid appears to reduce transfusion rate at the expense of increased cardiovascular morbidity. There are encouraging results from one centre with the use of agents to stimulate red cell production, including intravenous iron and erythropoietin. UK practice differs significantly from these patients and these studies, and it is not clear whether these promising results will translate to the UK population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 12%
Student > Master 15 10%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 35 24%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Unspecified 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 42 29%