↓ Skip to main content

Litter quality versus soil microbial community controls over decomposition: a quantitative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
Title
Litter quality versus soil microbial community controls over decomposition: a quantitative analysis
Published in
Oecologia, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2758-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory C. Cleveland, Sasha C. Reed, Adrienne B. Keller, Diana R. Nemergut, Sean P. O’Neill, Rebecca Ostertag, Peter M. Vitousek

Abstract

The possible effects of soil microbial community structure on organic matter decomposition rates have been widely acknowledged, but are poorly understood. Understanding these relationships is complicated by the fact that microbial community structure and function are likely to both affect and be affected by organic matter quality and chemistry, thus it is difficult to draw mechanistic conclusions from field studies. We conducted a reciprocal soil inoculum × litter transplant laboratory incubation experiment using samples collected from a set of sites that have similar climate and plant species composition but vary significantly in bacterial community structure and litter quality. The results showed that litter quality explained the majority of variation in decomposition rates under controlled laboratory conditions: over the course of the 162-day incubation, litter quality explained nearly two-thirds (64%) of variation in decomposition rates, and a smaller proportion (25%) was explained by variation in the inoculum type. In addition, the relative importance of inoculum type on soil respiration increased over the course of the experiment, and was significantly higher in microcosms with lower litter quality relative to those with higher quality litter. We also used molecular phylogenetics to examine the relationships between bacterial community composition and soil respiration in samples through time. Pyrosequencing revealed that bacterial community composition explained 32 % of the variation in respiration rates. However, equal portions (i.e., 16%) of the variation in bacterial community composition were explained by inoculum type and litter quality, reflecting the importance of both the meta-community and the environment in bacterial assembly. Taken together, these results indicate that the effects of changing microbial community composition on decomposition are likely to be smaller than the potential effects of climate change and/or litter quality changes in response to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations or atmospheric nutrient deposition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Japan 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 367 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 26%
Researcher 72 19%
Student > Master 54 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 9%
Student > Bachelor 25 6%
Other 57 15%
Unknown 42 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 41%
Environmental Science 98 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Chemistry 4 1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 72 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,637
of 4,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,703
of 198,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#33
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.