You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The tannosome is an organelle forming condensed tannins in the chlorophyllous organs of Tracheophyta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mct168 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Marc Brillouet, Charles Romieu, Benoît Schoefs, Katalin Solymosi, Véronique Cheynier, Hélène Fulcrand, Jean-Luc Verdeil, Geneviève Conéjéro |
| Abstract |
Condensed tannins (also called proanthocyanidins) are widespread polymers of catechins and are essential for the defence mechanisms of vascular plants (Tracheophyta). A large body of evidence argues for the synthesis of monomeric epicatechin on the cytosolic face of the endoplasmic reticulum and its transport to the vacuole, although the site of its polymerization into tannins remains to be elucidated. The aim of the study was to re-examine the cellular frame of tannin polymerization in various representatives of the Tracheophyta. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 23% |
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 69% |
| Scientists | 8 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 105 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 12 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#350,684
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#15
of 3,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,556
of 214,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#1
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.