Title |
Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-2840-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giulio Belli, Brice Gayet, Ho-Seong Han, Go Wakabayashi, Ki-hun Kim, Robert Cannon, Hironori Kaneko, Thomas Gamblin, Alan Koffron, Ibrahim Dagher, Joseph F. Buell, International Consensus Group for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery |
Abstract |
Since the inception of laparoscopic liver surgery, the left-lateral sectionectomy has become the standard of care for resection of lesions located in segments II and III. However, few centers employee laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy on a routine basis. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy as a standard of care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
United Arab Emirates | 1 | 25% |
Mexico | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 6 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 47% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2013.
All research outputs
#13,765,625
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,905
of 6,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,709
of 194,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#48
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.