↓ Skip to main content

Disentangling the Associations Between Autistic-Like and Internalizing Traits: A Community Based Twin Study

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Disentangling the Associations Between Autistic-Like and Internalizing Traits: A Community Based Twin Study
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10802-011-9596-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria Hallett, Angelica Ronald, Fruhling Rijsdijk, Francesca Happé

Abstract

Internalizing difficulties are prevalent in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), yet little is known about the underlying cause of this comorbidity. It is also unclear which types of autistic-like and internalizing difficulties are most strongly associated. The current study investigated the phenotypic and etiological associations between specific autistic-like traits and internalizing traits within a population-based sample. Parent-reported data were analyzed from 7,311 twin pairs at age 7 to 8 years. Structural equation modeling revealed distinguishable patterns of overlap between the three autistic-like traits (social difficulties, communication problems and repetitive/restricted behaviors) and four subtypes of internalizing traits (social anxiety, fears, generalized anxiety, negative affect). Although all phenotypic associations were modest (rph = 0.00-0.36), autistic-like communication impairments and repetitive/restricted behaviors correlated most strongly with generalized anxiety and negative affect both phenotypically and genetically. Conversely, autistic-like social difficulties showed little overlap with internalizing behaviors. Disentangling these associations and their etiological underpinnings may help contribute to the conceptualization and diagnosis of 'comorbidity' within ASD and internalizing disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 61 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,947
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,312
of 246,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.