| Title |
Efficacy of strength and aerobic exercise on patient-reported outcomes and structural changes in patients with knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-266 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Britt Elin Øiestad, Nina Østerås, Richard Frobell, Margreth Grotle, Helga Brøgger, May Arna Risberg |
| Abstract |
Despite an extensive literature on treatment interventions for patients with knee osteoarthritis, studies comparing the efficacy of different exercise interventions and living the life as usual on quality of life, cartilage quality and cost-effectiveness are lacking. The aim of the present study is to compare the efficacy of two different exercise programs compared to a control group in individuals with established radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis on self-reported knee-related quality of life, knee pain, physical function, and cartilage quality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 16% |
| Researcher | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 15% |
| Unknown | 115 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 36 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Unknown | 133 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2014.
All research outputs
#13,896,815
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,019
of 4,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,599
of 198,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#47
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.