Title |
Modified anatomical retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal metastatic tumor: technique and survival analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2553-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xin Ma, Hongzhao Li, Xu Zhang, Qingbo Huang, Baojun Wang, Taoping Shi, Dongliang Hu, Qing Ai, Shangwen Liu, Jiangping Gao, Yong Yang, Jun Dong, Tao Zheng |
Abstract |
In a previous experience, anatomical retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (ARA) was proven safe, effective, and technically efficient for surgical adrenal diseases. However, laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis is controversial. We evaluated the safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of modified ARA technique for adrenal metastasis and predicted survival factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 65% |
Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,177,097
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,240
of 6,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,476
of 278,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#50
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,009 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.