| Title |
Intracoronary Cardiosphere-Derived Cells After Myocardial Infarction Evidence of Therapeutic Regeneration in the Final 1-Year Results of the CADUCEUS Trial (CArdiosphere-Derived aUtologous stem CElls to reverse ventricUlar dySfunction)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.724 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konstantinos Malliaras, Raj R. Makkar, Rachel R. Smith, Ke Cheng, Edwin Wu, Robert O. Bonow, Linda Marbán, Adam Mendizabal, Eugenio Cingolani, Peter V. Johnston, Gary Gerstenblith, Karl H. Schuleri, Albert C. Lardo, Eduardo Marbán |
| Abstract |
This study sought to report full 1-year results, detailed magnetic resonance imaging analysis, and determinants of efficacy in the prospective, randomized, controlled CADUCEUS (CArdiosphere-Derived aUtologous stem CElls to reverse ventricUlar dySfunction) trial. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Researcher | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 54 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 14% |
| Engineering | 18 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#466,684
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,154
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,464
of 211,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#5
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.