You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Absolute Risk Model to Identify Individuals at Elevated Risk for Pancreatic Cancer in the General Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0072311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison P. Klein, Sara Lindström, Julie B. Mendelsohn, Emily Steplowski, Alan A. Arslan, H. Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Charles S. Fuchs, Steven Gallinger, Myron Gross, Kathy Helzlsouer, Elizabeth A. Holly, Eric J. Jacobs, Andrea LaCroix, Donghui Li, Margaret T. Mandelson, Sara H. Olson, Gloria M. Petersen, Harvey A. Risch, Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, Wei Zheng, Laufey Amundadottir, Demetrius Albanes, Naomi E. Allen, William R. Bamlet, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Julie E. Buring, Paige M. Bracci, Federico Canzian, Sandra Clipp, Michelle Cotterchio, Eric J. Duell, Joanne Elena, J. Michael Gaziano, Edward L. Giovannucci, Michael Goggins, Göran Hallmans, Manal Hassan, Amy Hutchinson, David J. Hunter, Charles Kooperberg, Robert C. Kurtz, Simin Liu, Kim Overvad, Domenico Palli, Alpa V. Patel, Kari G. Rabe, Xiao-Ou Shu, Nadia Slimani, Geoffrey S. Tobias, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Paolo Vineis, Jarmo Virtamo, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Brian M. Wolpin, Herbert Yu, Kai Yu, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Stephen J. Chanock, Robert N. Hoover, Patricia Hartge, Peter Kraft |
| Abstract |
We developed an absolute risk model to identify individuals in the general population at elevated risk of pancreatic cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Belgium | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,030,117
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#103,176
of 199,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,692
of 198,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,423
of 4,899 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,899 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.