↓ Skip to main content

Psychological Interventions for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Their Partners: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological Interventions for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease and Their Partners: A Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0073459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Reid, Chantal F. Ski, David R. Thompson

Abstract

Despite evidence that patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and their partners report significant psychological distress, and suggestions that involving partners in interventions alleviates such distress, no systematic reviews have examined this. The objective of this study was to systematically review evidence on the effectiveness of psychological interventions for patients with CHD and their partners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,929,526
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,739
of 193,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,006
of 196,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,875
of 5,049 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,049 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.