↓ Skip to main content

Biochemistry of tellurium

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, December 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Biochemistry of tellurium
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, December 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02785282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Taylor

Abstract

Tellurium (Te) demonstrates properties similar to those of elements known to be toxic to humans, and has applications in industrial processes, which are rapidly growing in importance and scale. It is relevant, therefore, to consider the tellurium physiology, toxicity, and methods for monitoring the element in biological and environmental specimens. Animal studies suggest that up to 25% of orally administered tellurium is absorbed in the gut. There is a biphasic elimination from the circulation with loss of about 50% within a short period, t1/2 = 0.81 d, and slower elimination of the residual Te, t1/2 = 12.9 d. Following a single ip, injection the largest proportion is in the kidney and bone, but with repeated oral administration, Te is found in the heart > > kidney, spleen, bone, and lung. Formation of dimethyl telluride is a characteristic feature of exposure, and gives a pungent garlic-like odor to breath, excreta, and the viscera. The main target sites for Te toxicity are the kidney, nervous system, skin, and the fetus (hydrocephalus). Te can be reliable measured in different specimens by several analytical techniques. Recent work has employed hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Topics for further investigation are proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 15 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Materials Science 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 29 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,193,510
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#278
of 2,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,628
of 93,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.