↓ Skip to main content

Can axillary radiotherapy replace axillary dissection for patients with positive sentinel nodes? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 209)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can axillary radiotherapy replace axillary dissection for patients with positive sentinel nodes? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Published in
Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cdtm.2017.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Zhao, Wei‐Guang Liu, Lei Zhang, Zi‐Ning Jin, Zhan Li, Cheng Liu, Dong‐Bao Li, Ying Ma, Jing‐Wen Zhang, Feng Jin, Bo Chen

Abstract

To compare the efficacy of axillary radiotherapy (ART) with that of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library by using the search terms "breast cancer", "sentinel lymph node biopsy", "axillary radiotherapy" or "regional node irradiation" for articles published between 2004 and 2016. Only randomized controlled trials that included patients with positive sentinel nodes were included in the meta-analysis. Two randomized controlled trials and three retrospective studies were identified. The reported overall survival rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-1.43, P = 0.365), disease-free survival rate (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.58-1.45, P = 0.144), and axillary recurrence rate (1.2% and 0.4%, and 1.3% and 0.8%, respectively) were similar in both groups. The absence of knowledge on the extent of nodal involvement in the ART group appeared to have no major impact on the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy. ART is not inferior to cALND in the patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer who had a positive sentinel lymph node. Information obtained by using cALND after SLNB may have no major impact on the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 22%
Student > Master 5 22%
Other 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,357,897
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine
#44
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,928
of 322,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.