You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stimulating Natural Regeneration of Tropical Forest on Degraded Land: Approaches, Outcomes, and Information Gaps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Restoration Ecology, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/rec.12048 |
| Authors |
Luke P. Shoo, Carla P. Catterall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 17% |
| Researcher | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 15% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,169,899
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#613
of 1,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,225
of 202,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.